Agent Breach · Code Security

Find security issues in the code you ship

Review authorized GitHub repositories and pull requests at pinned commits. See evidence, understand the risk and decide which fixes to propose before the next release.

Built for development teams

Move from a warning to an informed fix

Review closer to the change

Audit a whole repository or focus on the changes in a pull request, while the context is still fresh.

Keep the evidence with the finding

See the affected file, source link, severity, rationale and available fix preview in one place.

Stay in control of changes

Review suggestions and select fixes yourself. Nothing is pushed to your repository automatically.

Choose the scope that answers your question

Full repository

Run checks across the authorized repository at a fixed commit and review the resulting findings by severity and file.

Pull request changes

Compare a PR with its base commit to focus the review on newly introduced code and dependency changes.

What we inspect

Multiple checks, one review

Automated tools provide signals across source, dependencies and repository configuration. Findings still need context and validation.

Source-code patterns

Semgrep checks supported code for insecure patterns and gives a precise source location.

Potential secrets

Gitleaks flags credential candidates. Values are redacted in reports and suspected secrets need validation.

Vulnerable dependencies

Trivy and OSV compare detected package versions with published advisories; affected versions alone do not prove exploitability.

Workflow and supply-chain hygiene

GitHub Actions checks and available OpenSSF Scorecard signals highlight repository configuration risks.

How it works

A review your team can act on

01

Connect GitHub

Install the GitHub App, authorize the repositories you choose and accept hosted-audit consent.

02

Select an audit

Choose a complete repository or PR delta. The audit uses a pinned commit so the scope stays clear.

03

Triage the evidence

Inspect grouped findings, source links and suggested diffs where a safe patch is available.

04

Choose the next step

Select changes to propose as PRs, or follow practical manual guidance. Recheck the original findings within 30 days.

A technical report you can use

Export the scope, commit, methodology, findings, evidence and limitations. Findings without a safe automatic diff still include practical remediation guidance.

Clear limits, fewer surprises

This is a source-code review, not a pentest of the running application. A dependency advisory is not proof of reachability. Partial scanner coverage is shown, and no fix PR is opened without your request.

Review the next change with context

Connect an authorized repository and inspect what the scanners found before deciding what to fix.