Find web vulnerabilities—and show developers exactly what the scanner observed.
Agent Breach coordinates 45+ security capabilities, separates confirmed findings from signals, and records evidence, remediation, and retest history for authorized web apps and APIs.
30-minute walkthrough · discuss one app and its safeguards · no commitment
Inspect the product before you connect an app.
Security software should earn access with evidence. Review the workflow, output, and data handling before creating an account.
Use the live simulation
Walk through an OWASP Juice Shop scan, findings, tool output, and reports. No account and no traffic to your systems.
Explore the simulation →Read the deliverable
Open a generated lab report and inspect the format, evidence, caveats, and remediation your team receives.
Open sample report →Review data handling
See hosting region, credential encryption, retention, subprocessors, authorization controls, and current certification status.
Read security details →Know the trial terms
A new company domain receives up to 14 calendar days of write access, starting when its first account is created, for one authorized target and one scan. No card and no automatic charge.
Start the evaluation →Confirmed finding record
Evidence stays separate from a scanner alert.
A recorded finding shows what was observed and what remains uncertain. Confirmation is explicit instead of inferred from status codes or redirects.
- Affected URL, method, parameter, and recorded request
- Observed result and validation or control comparison
- Reproduction steps and proof-of-concept material when captured
- Confirmation state, source output, caveats, and remediation
See what you get.
Finding records, captured reproduction material, executive summaries, and standards-aligned exports, with missing evidence, signals, and caveats kept visible.
Reports for audit workflows
We do not certify your organization. On paid plans, export audit-ready evidence you can attach to GRC workflows, customer questionnaires, and auditor reviews.
- PDF pentest templates: AI Explained, Executive, Developer, OWASP WSTG/ASVS, NIST 800-115 & CSF 2.0, CREST, PCI-DSS ASV-style, CIS Controls
- Framework mapping JSON (full catalog matrices with covered/partial/N/A/gap statuses): SOC 2, PCI-DSS, HIPAA, ISO 27001, MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise, CIS Controls, NIST CSF 2.0, OWASP ASVS — applicability follows app type (e.g. HIPAA only when healthcare/PHI context)
- Evidence Pack ZIP for audit workflows
- Retest appendix: fix-verification outcomes for remediated findings
- Structured exports: PDF, JSON, and CSV
- White-label PDF branding on Team and Enterprise
PCI-DSS ASV-style templates document vulnerability assessment findings—they do not constitute PCI ASV certification or a Qualified Security Assessor attestation.
From URL to report.
Authorize a target, choose the appropriate profile, and keep the resulting evidence with the finding.
Add your URL
~2 min setup
Staging or prod. Optionally add OAuth, SAML, API key, or session cookie.
We simulate attacks
Duration depends on profile and surface
The planner selects and sequences relevant capabilities, then validates discoveries against recorded responses and control comparisons.
Fix and ship
Retest when the fix is ready
Review confirmation state, reproduction steps, source output, and remediation. Export the result or route it through CI.
AI that thinks like an attacker.
Signature scanners replay templates. Agent Breach uses response evidence to select and sequence capabilities from a catalog of 45+ security tools and techniques.
Why checkbox scanning falls short
Traditional DAST fires known payloads and lists isolated hits. Attackers probe auth flows, chain IDOR with injection, and pivot across endpoints. That requires reasoning—not just signatures.
The Agent Breach loop
- 01
Discover
Map endpoints, OpenAPI specs, GraphQL schemas, auth surfaces, and technology—authenticated and unauthenticated.
- 02
Orchestrate
The LLM selects the next tools and tests via MCP based on what each response reveals.
- 03
Chain
Connect injection, access-control, and session flaws into exploitable attack paths.
- 04
Rank
Prioritize by exploitability and business impact—not raw alert volume.
- 05
Explain
LLM-enhanced reports with clear remediation—not a raw tool dump.
Transparent stack: Nuclei, SQLMap, Nikto, and other specialized capabilities, with original tool output retained for review.
Public vulnerability research can steer planning and produce stack-matched alerts. Any verification still follows the selected profile, target authorization, and recorded scope.
What we analyze on every PR.
Connect the GitHub App to run hosted pull request scans with check runs, inline review comments on changed files, and a clear pass/warn/fail policy.
Semgrep (SAST)
Static analysis for insecure code patterns across the PR branch.
Gitleaks (secrets)
Detect hardcoded API keys, tokens, and credentials in repository files.
Trivy
Dependency CVEs and IaC misconfigurations on the checked-out filesystem.
OSV Scanner
Known vulnerabilities in lockfiles and dependency manifests.
OpenSSF Scorecard
Repository supply-chain hygiene checks below configured thresholds.
Workflow hardening
GitHub Actions pinning, permissions, and least-privilege workflow checks.
Dependency manifest delta
Flags added, changed, or removed lockfiles and manifests vs the PR base branch.
Most engines analyze the PR branch snapshot (head commit). Dependency manifest delta compares base vs head lockfiles. Inline GitHub comments prioritize files changed in the pull request.
GitHub PR scanning is available on paid plans with explicit hosted-scan consent.
What you get hiring Agent Breach.
Most stacks mix categories. Scan this table to see why teams choose us over signature DAST or waiting on classic PTaaS alone.
| Signature DAST / monitoring | PTaaS / human pentest | Agent BreachBest for continuous AppSec | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best for | Broad CVE & misconfig monitoring | Deep creative testing, compliance sign-off | Continuous web/API offensive simulation |
| Cadence | Scheduled scans | 1–4× per year | Scheduled, deploy, and PR checks |
| Human oversight | None / alert noise | Full human engagement | Automated validation; review scope depends on service |
| Output | Isolated findings | PDF + human narrative | Chained paths, repro steps, attack graph (paid) |
| Time to start | Days to weeks of setup | Weeks to months | Minutes |
| Auth testing | Often limited | Strong | OAuth, SAML, cookies, API keys |
| Pricing entry | Mid-tier subscriptions | Five–six figures annually | Team self-serve + Enterprise |
Agent Breach is EU-hosted SaaS with no installation on your infrastructure. It supports continuous validation between scoped human assessments; formal attestations and some business-logic reviews may still need a specialist.
Teams who ship with confidence.
What attackers are exploiting now.
Who's behind Agent Breach
Denis Cabral Lopes
Founder & Principal Software Engineer
I created Agent Breach because getting a security report, or even knowing what's vulnerable in your application, is often long, slow, and buried in bureaucracy. I wanted to build something faster and more accessible. Something easy to use, where you see findings as you go and understand what's running under the hood. While companies wait months between pentests, they stay exposed. Attackers get too much time to exploit weaknesses that a quicker process would catch. Pentesting shouldn't be a once-a-year exercise. It should run as often as you ship.
Before Agent Breach, I spent more than a decade designing and leading software platforms for fintech, renewable energy, and data-intensive industries. That includes cloud analytics systems processing hundreds of terabytes of data, and production services used by institutional customers. Today I lead Agent Breach end to end: product vision, architecture, and the core engineering behind the platform. I'm based in Madrid.
Connect on LinkedInCommon questions.
Delivery partner
Organizations building and delivering with Agent Breach.
Bring one application. Leave with a concrete plan.
Book a walkthrough to discuss the target, authorization, safeguards, evidence requirements, and integrations before any scan begins.